Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Human prion diseases: progress in clinical trials

Human prion diseases: progress in clinical trials




Inga Zerr, MD




+ Author Affiliations




National TSE Reference Centre Clinical Dementia Centre Department of Neurology University Medical School Georg-August University Goettingen, Germany




Correspondence to: Inga Zerr. E-mail: epicjd@med.uni-goettingen.de




The progress made in understanding disease pathology and phenomenology in prion disorders and recent advances in diagnostic techniques might encourage researchers now to consider therapeutic trials in patients with Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Although attempts have been made in the past (Trevitt and Collinge, 2006; Stewart et al., 2008), the drugs tested involved a variety of compounds that belong to antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory or analgesic substance classes and most of the studies are limited to extremely small series or single case reports. Controlled trials are rare but progress in diagnostic techniques, such as imaging, CSF biomarkers and recently developed methods to detect abnormal prion protein in easily accessible body fluids, will hopefully lead to early diagnosis of the disease. Although clinical trials are difficult to perform, they are feasible and clinicians must contemplate several specific problems when evaluating the efficacy of a drug in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.




Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease is the most common human prion disease form, but still rare, with an annual incidence range between one and two cases per million per year worldwide (Ladogana et al., 2005). Any potential benefit of a drug must be proven on a large number of patients. Low disease incidence and prevalence are therefore problematic in terms of sample size. The median disease duration reported for all forms of sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease is ∼6 months (Pocchiari et al., 2004; Heinemann et al., 2007). The disease duration varies, and major determinants of survival such as age at onset, gender and PRNP codon 129 genotype have been identified (Ladogana et al., 2005). Unlike more chronic neurological disorders, prolonging survival from time of diagnosis offers one obvious and tractable outcome for a clinical trial. However, because of rapid disease progression, the clinical diagnosis of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease is frequently not made until middle and late disease stages.




There is a wide scope of clinical phenomenology in human prion disease with respect to presenting features, rate of progression and appearance of other clinical manifestation (Parchi et al., 1999; Zerr et al., 2000; Heinemann et al., 2007). Phenotypic variability in the clinical syndrome and neuropathological changes in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease were recognized long ago and some attempts have been made to define disease subtypes based on a molecular disease classification (Parchi et al., 1999). But as with many neurological disorders, heterogeneity of the clinical and pathological phenotype may reduce power even if an adequate sample can be recruited for a particular study.




Taking these considerations into account, clinicians face important decisions when designing a trial to assess efficacy and safety in the context of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Scales have been designed to monitor disease progression in Alzheimer’s disease; and for vascular dementia and frontotemporal dementia (Braaten et al., 2006). Unfortunately, these systems are not suitable for monitoring cognitive decline in patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease because of the different neuropsychological profiles. Also, neurological abnormalities such as ataxia, rigidity or myoclonus need to be monitored in a standard way. Because of the variability in clinical syndromes across molecular Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease subtypes, specific scales, weighted for particular subtypes, would be needed. Anticipating this issue, trial protocols need to include a variety of rating scales designed to probe neurological, cognitive, psychiatric and general functional status.




The paper by Andrew Thompson and colleagues in the current issue of Brain directly addresses these issues. The goal was to develop a rating scale for the progression of symptoms in prion diseases (the MRC Prion Disease Rating Scale) that could be used as an outcome measure in future clinical trials, as no single scale has been able to capture progression across the full range of functional domains affected in patients with prion diseases. The analysis was performed on data obtained from 437 clinical trial participants over a period of several years. Scale development included semi-quantitative and qualitative carer interviews, item response modelling, inter-rater reliability testing, construct analysis and correlation with several existing scales. The proposed 20-point MRC Prion Disease Rating Scale assesses domains of cognitive function, speech, mobility, personal care/feeding and continence. An important point is that the items are weighted according to their relative importance documented by interview with carers. Another advantage is easy application; the scale can be used over the telephone and will allow frequent assessments, which are necessary because of the rapid progression of the disease.




This is an important and timely study and analysis was carried out in a large cohort. The study addresses a fundamental issue in clinical trials of prion diseases: which scales can be used to monitor the rapid change in several domains including cognitive, motor and global decline? The scales need to be validated in future prospective studies on prion diseases but potentially other rapid progressive neurological conditions too (including Alzheimer’s disease or dementia with Lewy bodies with rapid progression). Clinical research in rare diseases is extremely challenging for logistic, statistical and financial reasons and systematic data collection in a multi-centre/multi-national setting is required to obtain sufficient information in a reasonable time frame. The work presented here is one important step towards achieving the challenging goal to find and then evaluate an effective treatment, or even a cure, for this devastating disorder. © The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.




This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.




References ↵




Braaten AJ, Parsons TD, McCue R, Sellers A, Burns WJ . Neurocognitive differential diagnosis of dementing disease: Alzheimer's dementia, vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia, and major depressive disorder. Int J Neurosci 2006;116:1271-93. CrossRefMedline




Heinemann U, Krasnianski A, Meissner B, Varges D, Bartl M, Stoeck K, et al . Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in Germany: a prospective 12-year surveillance. Brain 2007;130:1350-9. Abstract/FREE Full Text




Ladogana A, Puopolo M, Croes EA, Budka H, Jarius C, Collins S, et al . Mortality from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and related disorders in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Neurology 2005;64:1586-91. CrossRef




Parchi P, Giese A, Capellari S, Brown P, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Windl O, et al . Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on molecular and phenotypic analysis of 300 subjects. Ann Neurol 1999;46:224-33. CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science




Pocchiari M, Poupolo M, Croes EA, Budka H, Gelpi E, Collins S, et al . Predictors of survival in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Brain 2004;10:2348-59. Search Google Scholar




Stewart LA, Rydzewska LH, Keogh GF, Knight RS . Systematic review of therapeutic interventions in human prion diseases. Neurology 2008;70:1272-81. CrossRef




Trevitt CR, Collinge J . A systematic review of prion therapeutics in experimental models. Brain 2006;129:2241-65. Abstract/FREE Full Text




Zerr I, Schulz-Schaeffer WJ, Giese A, Bodemer M, Schröter A, Henkel K, et al . Current clinical diagnosis in CJD: identification of uncommon variants. Ann Neurol 2000;48:323-9.











The Medical Research Council Prion Disease Rating Scale: a new outcome measure for prion disease therapeutic trials developed and validated using systematic observational studies




Andrew G.B. Thompson1,2, Jessica Lowe1,2, Zoe Fox3, Ana Lukic1,2, Marie-Claire Porter1,2, Liz Ford2, Michele Gorham2, Gosala S. Gopalakrishnan2, Peter Rudge1,2, A. Sarah Walker4, John Collinge1,2 and Simon Mead1,2




+ Author Affiliations




1 MRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London (UCL) Institute of Neurology, UCLH NHS Trust, Queen Square, London, UK




2 National Prion Clinic, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Trust, Queen Square, London, UK




3 Joint Research Office Biostatistics Unit, UCL, and Education Unit, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK




4 MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK




Correspondence to: Professor John Collinge, MD, FRS, FRCP, MRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK E-mail: j.collinge@prion.ucl.ac.uk Received October 31, 2012. Revision received December 18, 2012. Accepted January 31, 2013.




Summary




Progress in therapeutics for rare disorders like prion disease is impeded by the lack of validated outcome measures and a paucity of natural history data derived from prospective observational studies. The first analysis of the UK National Prion Monitoring Cohort involved 1337 scheduled clinical assessments and 479 telephone assessments in 437 participants over 373 patient-years of follow-up. Scale development has included semi-quantitative and qualitative carer interviews, item response modelling (Rasch analysis), inter-rater reliability testing, construct analysis and correlation with several existing scales. The proposed 20-point Medical Research Council Prion Disease Rating Scale assesses domains of cognitive function, speech, mobility, personal care/feeding and continence, according to their relative importance documented by carer interviews. It is quick and simple to administer, and has been validated for use by doctors and nurses and for use over the telephone, allowing for frequent assessments that capture the rapid change typical of these diseases. The Medical Research Council Scale correlates highly with widely used cognitive and single item scales, but has substantial advantages over these including minimal floor effects. Three clear patterns of decline were observed using the scale: fast linear decline, slow linear decline (usually inherited prion disease) and in some patients, decline followed by a prolonged preterminal plateau at very low functional levels. Rates of decline and progress through milestones measured using the scale vary between sporadic, acquired and inherited prion diseases following clinical expectations. We have developed and validated a new functionally-oriented outcome measure and propose that future clinical trials in prion disease should collect data compatible with this scale, to allow for combined and comparative analyses. Such approaches may be advantageous in orphan conditions, where single studies of feasible duration will often struggle to achieve statistical power.




Key words prion cohort rating scale outcome measure CJD










Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease CJD worlds youngest documented victim, 11 years old, shall we pray




'Pray por Cristina' video highlights prayer movement for girl with degenerative disease




Date: 2013-03-31 08:00:00




March 31, 2013. (ROMEREPORTS.COM) (-VIDEO ONLY-) A social network that allows users to ask and give prayers, MayFeelings.com, published the story of one of its youngest members. Her name is Cristina and is the youngest person in the world that suffers from a degenerative neurological disease called Creutzfeldt-Jakob, a fatal condition that attacks the brain.




Her parents have tried all they can to try to save her, but no known cure of the disease has been developed. As a result, his father Juan Perican uploaded her story to the social network, which has drawn support from thousands throughout the world.




Using the hashtag #prayporcristina on Twitter, they ask for prayers. “People call us asking if we need anything, money, if they could help us... but we only want to be with Cristina. We thank them a lot of their support, but we always tell them the same thing: the only thing they can do is pray,” her mother explains in the video.
















sporadic CJD, 11 year old victim, 2 year clinical course to date ???




Saturday, March 23, 2013


CJD Incidents Panel to be disbanded






Thursday, February 21, 2013


National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center Cases Examined January 16, 2013







16 YEAR OLD SPORADIC FFI ?





Monday, January 14, 2013


Gambetti et al USA Prion Unit change another highly suspect USA mad cow victim to another fake name i.e. sporadic FFI at age 16 CJD Foundation goes along with this BSe







Monday, December 31, 2012


Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease and Human TSE Prion Disease in Washington State, 2006–2011-2012








Tuesday, December 25, 2012


CREUTZFELDT JAKOB TSE PRION DISEASE HUMANS END OF YEAR REVIEW DECEMBER 25, 2012








Tuesday, June 26, 2012


Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease Human TSE report update North America, Canada, Mexico, and USDA PRION UNIT as of May 18, 2012


type determination pending Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease (tdpCJD), is on the rise in Canada and the USA








Wednesday, June 13, 2012


MEXICO IS UNDER or MIS DIAGNOSING CREUTZFELDT JAKOB DISEASE AND OTHER PRION DISEASE SOME WITH POSSIBLE nvCJD








*** The discovery of previously unrecognized prion diseases in both humans and animals (i.e., Nor98 in small ruminants) demonstrates that the range of prion diseases might be wider than expected and raises crucial questions about the epidemiology and strain properties of these new forms. We are investigating this latter issue by molecular and biological comparison of VPSPr, GSS and Nor98.




VARIABLY PROTEASE-SENSITVE PRIONOPATHY IS TRANSMISSIBLE ...price of prion poker goes up again $




OR-10: Variably protease-sensitive prionopathy is transmissible in bank voles




Romolo Nonno,1 Michele Di Bari,1 Laura Pirisinu,1 Claudia D’Agostino,1 Stefano Marcon,1 Geraldina Riccardi,1 Gabriele Vaccari,1 Piero Parchi,2 Wenquan Zou,3 Pierluigi Gambetti,3 Umberto Agrimi1 1Istituto Superiore di Sanità; Rome, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, Università di Bologna; Bologna, Italy; 3Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland, OH USA




Background. Variably protease-sensitive prionopathy (VPSPr) is a recently described “sporadic”neurodegenerative disease involving prion protein aggregation, which has clinical similarities with non-Alzheimer dementias, such as fronto-temporal dementia. Currently, 30 cases of VPSPr have been reported in Europe and USA, of which 19 cases were homozygous for valine at codon 129 of the prion protein (VV), 8 were MV and 3 were MM. A distinctive feature of VPSPr is the electrophoretic pattern of PrPSc after digestion with proteinase K (PK). After PK-treatment, PrP from VPSPr forms a ladder-like electrophoretic pattern similar to that described in GSS cases. The clinical and pathological features of VPSPr raised the question of the correct classification of VPSPr among prion diseases or other forms of neurodegenerative disorders. Here we report preliminary data on the transmissibility and pathological features of VPSPr cases in bank voles.




Materials and Methods. Seven VPSPr cases were inoculated in two genetic lines of bank voles, carrying either methionine or isoleucine at codon 109 of the prion protein (named BvM109 and BvI109, respectively). Among the VPSPr cases selected, 2 were VV at PrP codon 129, 3 were MV and 2 were MM. Clinical diagnosis in voles was confirmed by brain pathological assessment and western blot for PK-resistant PrPSc (PrPres) with mAbs SAF32, SAF84, 12B2 and 9A2.




Results. To date, 2 VPSPr cases (1 MV and 1 MM) gave positive transmission in BvM109. Overall, 3 voles were positive with survival time between 290 and 588 d post inoculation (d.p.i.). All positive voles accumulated PrPres in the form of the typical PrP27–30, which was indistinguishable to that previously observed in BvM109 inoculated with sCJDMM1 cases.




In BvI109, 3 VPSPr cases (2 VV and 1 MM) showed positive transmission until now. Overall, 5 voles were positive with survival time between 281 and 596 d.p.i.. In contrast to what observed in BvM109, all BvI109 showed a GSS-like PrPSc electrophoretic pattern, characterized by low molecular weight PrPres. These PrPres fragments were positive with mAb 9A2 and 12B2, while being negative with SAF32 and SAF84, suggesting that they are cleaved at both the C-terminus and the N-terminus. Second passages are in progress from these first successful transmissions.




Conclusions. Preliminary results from transmission studies in bank voles strongly support the notion that VPSPr is a transmissible prion disease. Interestingly, VPSPr undergoes divergent evolution in the two genetic lines of voles, with sCJD-like features in BvM109 and GSS-like properties in BvI109.




The discovery of previously unrecognized prion diseases in both humans and animals (i.e., Nor98 in small ruminants) demonstrates that the range of prion diseases might be wider than expected and raises crucial questions about the epidemiology and strain properties of these new forms. We are investigating this latter issue by molecular and biological comparison of VPSPr, GSS and Nor98.










Wednesday, March 28, 2012


VARIABLY PROTEASE-SENSITVE PRIONOPATHY IS TRANSMISSIBLE, price of prion poker goes up again $








Tuesday, March 5, 2013


Use of Materials Derived From Cattle in Human Food and Cosmetics; Reopening of the Comment Period FDA-2004-N-0188-0051 (TSS SUBMISSION)


FDA believes current regulation protects the public from BSE but reopens comment period due to new studies








Tuesday, March 05, 2013


A closer look at prion strains Characterization and important implications Prion


7:2, 99–108; March/April 2013; © 2013 Landes Bioscience








Wednesday, March 20, 2013


GAO-13-244, Mar 18, 2013 Dietary Supplements FDA May Have Opportunities to Expand Its Use of Reported Health Problems to Oversee Product


From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr.


Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:46 PM


To: gomezj@gao.gov


Cc: siggerudk@gao.gov ; youngc1@gao.gov ; oighotline@gao.gov










Wednesday, February 20, 2013


World Organization for Animal Health Recommends United States' BSE Risk Status Be Upgraded


Statement from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack:










Thursday, February 14, 2013


The Many Faces of Mad Cow Disease Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE and TSE prion disease








Sunday, March 31, 2013


Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease CJD worlds youngest documented victim, 11 years old, shall we pray









TSS

Monday, December 24, 2012

Immunotherapy in prion disease

Review Nature Reviews Neurology, advance online publication, Published online 18 December 2012 | doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.258


Subject Categories: Spongiform encephalopathies | Neurodegenerative disease


Immunotherapy in prion disease


Yvonne Roettger, Yansheng Du, Michael Bacher, Inga Zerr, Richard Dodel & Jan-Philipp Bach About the authors


Top of page Abstract Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), also known as prion diseases, describe a group of fatal neurodegenerative disorders affecting both humans and animals. Accumulation of misfolded prion proteins is the pathological hallmark of these disorders; such accumulation occurs in lymphoreticular tissue prior to CNS involvement in scrapie, experimental models and human variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Lymphoreticular accumulation of misfolded prion protein has not been demonstrated in human sporadic or genetic forms of TSE. Once clinical symptoms develop, all prion disorders have a rapidly progressive and lethal course, and no effective therapy exists. In the past 10 years, antibody-based immunotherapy has been considered for other neurodegenerative disorders associated with protein misfolding and, therefore, might also be an effective approach to prevention or treatment of prion disease. Self-tolerance to endogenous prion protein is, however, a major challenge to the development of effective immunotherapy, as is the risk of adverse effects from active immunization. This Review summarizes the evidence that immunization could slow disease progression or increase lifespan in animal models of prion diseases. The therapeutic potential of these strategies in treating patients with prion diseases is also discussed.


Top of page Author affiliations Y. Roettger, Y. Du, M. Bacher, I. Zerr, R. Dodel & J. -P. Bach Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany (Y. Roettger, R. Dodel, J. -P. Bach). Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 975 West Walnut Street IB 457, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA (Y. Du). Institute of Immunology, University of Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Strasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany (M. Bacher). National Reference Centre for Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies, Department of Neurology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany (I. Zerr).


Correspondence to: R. Dodel dodel@med.uni-marburg.de


Published online 18 December 2012








December 13, 2012


The rise and fall of pentosan polysulfate in prion disease







TSS




Monday, December 17, 2012

The rise and fall of pentosan polysulfate in prion disease

December 13, 2012


The rise and fall of pentosan polysulfate in prion disease


Next to quinacrine, pentosan polysulfate (PPS) (above) has probably been the second-most examined drug in the treatment of prion disease. PPS never made it to an official clinical trial in the United States, but Japan and the U.K. each ran clinical trials, both of which failed. PPS has since been pretty much abandoned as a potential prion treatment, for more than one reason, but we can learn a lot from the history of research into this compound as an antiprion therapeutic.


Pentosan polysulfate was tested in mouse models of prion disease as early as 1984, but the real story begins, in a way, with Caughey & Race 1992, who observed that Congo red inhibits PrP accumulation in prion-infected cell culture. Congo red was originally invented as a stain for cellulose but has for decades been used in laboratories as a stain for amyloid plaques, which, after all, earned the name “amyloid” for their misleading resemblance to starch (amylum in Latin), which is composed of the same glucose subunits as cellulose, under staining. Like Alzheimer’s and some other neurodegenerative diseases, scrapie results in the deposition of amyloid plaques in brain tissue. Since Congo red stains (read: binds to) amyloid plaques effectively, Caughey and Race wondered if it might interfere with the formation of amyloid plaques as well. And it did – in fact, it pretty much completely abolished the formation of PrP-res, as shown in Fig 1A:


But Congo red was not exactly ready for prime time as a therapeutic compound. In fact, according to Wikipedia it’s so toxic that even the textile and paper industries won’t use it anymore (always a bad sign). So Caughey and Race’s discovery touched off a search for less toxic compounds with the same PrP-res-inhibiting property.


That search led ultimately to several hits including cpd-B and curcumin. But the race had been won before it started: a year before Caughey and Race’s discovery, another group had already announced that adminstration of the polyanion compound pentosan polysulfate resulted in a massive extension of survival in scrapie-infected mice [Diringer & Ehler 1991]. In fact, without any fanfare at all, these two had reported a significant effect of pentosan polysulfate as early as 1984, in a study whose primary purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of another polyanion compound: dextran sulfate 500 [Ehler & Diringer 1984]. Predictably, the 1984 study had found that DS500 was only effective against peripheral infection and not intracerebral – “polyanions” by definition are highly charged compounds, which the BBB‘s border control agents hate. But Diringer and Ehler’s 1984 and 1991 studies evaluated PPS’s efficacy only in peripherally infected mice, and only with drug administration either prophylactically or very early in the disease course. Ladogana 1992 had likewise shown efficacy against peripheral infection for DS500, pentosan polysulfate (referred to in that study as SP54) and suramin. In fact, Ladogana even tested DS500 and suramin (but not PPS) against intracerebral infection and found a small but significant effect for DS500.


So in fact, lots of work on PPS preceded Caughey’s discovery that Congo red inhibits PrP-res formation. But I chose to start the story with that oft-cited paper because it coincided with the beginning of scientific acceptance of the protein-only hypothesis and, with it, a new perspective on what a compound needed to do in order to fight prion infection. The studies by Ladogana, Farquhar, Diringer and Ehler all took place back in the dark ages when people thought scrapie was an “unconventional virus”, so much of the discussion in these papers centers on the supposed “antiviral” properties of DS500 and PPS. By 1993, putting together the newly emerging prion hypothesis (described as “controversial”) with the results from the 1992 Congo red study, Caughey had a better idea of why PPS might have been effective: perhaps it inhibited PrP-res formation just like Congo red. PPS isn’t exceptionally similar to Congo red, but the two do have two sulfate anions in common:


Congo red


And sure enough, Caughey was able to show that PPS inhibited PrP-res formation “in vivo” [Caughey & Raymond 1993], by which he actually meant ex vivo: in cell culture, not in a whole organism.


And curiously, no one provided in vivo validation of this finding for over a decade. Of course, PPS was already known to be effective in vivo – in early or prophylactic administration in peripherally infected mice. What remained was to show that PPS was also effective against intracerebral infection, and that it could abolish the amyloid plaques that characterized scrapie infection in mice and CJD in humans, plaques composed of a protein beginning to gain acceptance as being the pathological agent: PrP.


Instead, the next decade saw a series of basic science papers on PPS and related molecules such as heparin and heparan sulfate, using these molecules as tools to understand the biological and biochemical properties of PrP [Caughey 1994a, Caughey 1994b, Shyng 1995, Brimacombe 1999]. The most surprising of these was the confirmation that although PPS inhibits PrP-res formation in cell culture, it stimulates PrP-res formation in cell-free conversion [Wong 2001]. One other paper testing PPS in vivo did emerge after several years [Farquhar 1999], but it didn’t cite Caughey’s work and managed to remain wholly agnostic as to the identity of what it called the “bovine spongiform encephalopathy agent”, avoiding calling it either a ”prion” or a “virus”. Farquhar successfully duplicated the earlier in vivo results, showing that a single dose of PPS could dramatically delay disease onset or prevent it altogether, if administered intraperitoneally within several hours of the initial peripheral infection. The results replicated across several different mouse strains, but the issue of PPS’s possible interference with PrP and efficacy against CNS infections was left untouched.


When evidence on the in vivo efficacy of PPS against CNS prion infections finally did surface after more than a decade, it did so in a spectacular fashion. In 2004, Katsumi Doh-Ura demonstrated that continuous ventricular infusion of PPS of mice could extend survival by as much as 2.4-fold [Doh-Ura 2004]. His primary model was Tg7 mice expressing hamster PrP, infected intracerebrally with 263K hamster prions. Doh-Ura tested not only PPS but also quinacrine (no effect), chloroquine (no effect), E-64d (no effect), and amphotericin B (some effect). The whole experiment was exquisitely designed to test the drugs’ efficacy against CNS infections without bumping up against issues of blood-brain barrier permeability. It must have been an impossibly difficult experiment to pull off: Doh-Ura implanted miniature devices in the backs of the mice, just under the skin, with tubes leading to their left ventricles to continuously drip tiny amounts of PPS for four weeks after implantation until the chemical ran out. And it wasn’t prophylactic, either: the mice were treated beginning at 7, 21, 35 or 42 days post-infection (dpi), meaning the surgery had to be done on already scrapie-infected mice. Perhaps this explains what one prion researcher recently told me: Doh-Ura’s result was the best result there’s ever been for prion therapeutics; it’s just that no one has managed to reproduce it.


In the published literature, at least, no one has even tried to reproduce it. That’s probably in part because of the technical difficulty involved and in part because Doh-Ura had already left no stone unturned. The incredibly thorough study varied both the dose and the date that drug administration was started, as summarized beautifully in Fig. 2:


The results are very clear: PPS is most effective at a medium dose of 230 ug/kg/day and when administered as early as possible, though it still has a significant effect when administered late in the disease. At its best, it delayed death from 51 dpi for controls to 123 dpi for mice treated with 460 ug/kg/day starting from 7 dpi.


Not satisfied to show an effect on just one model, Doh-Ura also varied the mouse model and prion strain in question. His primary experiment used Tg7 mice, which overexpress hamster PrP and no mouse PrP, infected with 263K hamster prions; subsequently he also tested PPS by the same protocol in Tga20 mice (which overexpress mouse PrP) infected with Fukuoka-1 and RML prions. Those experiments showed smaller (regression to the mean, perhaps?) but still quite large, extensions of survival – 117% and 49% respectively when treatment was begun at 14 dpi.


Doh-Ura also tried subcutaneous administration of PPS with, as would be expected, no effect: PPS could not cross the blood-brain barrier.


The study didn’t skimp on follow-up experiments to figure out how PPS had worked, either. Doh-Ura did immunohistochemistry on the treated mouse brains and found a remarkable reduction in PrP deposits. In fact, the neurodegeneration that had killed the mice was almost wholly concentrated in the right hemisphere of the brain, while the left hemisphere, where the infusion site was, was spared the worst of it. Doh-Ura also assayed the infectivity of the mouse brains in the same blunt way that it’s still done today – by injecting their brain homogenate into other mice and comparing the survival of those mice to a standard table. Last but not least, Doh-Ura did toxicology experiments on mice, rats, and dogs – again, with intraventricular infusion – to determine the tolerated dose and assess what adverse effects might be anticipated.


The overall picture was of a drug of fairly low toxicity that reduced infectivity through direct action on the infectious protein itself, largely regardless of prion strain, and could more than double the incubation time of the disease if administered early enough. It was, and probably still is, the strongest result that’s ever been shown for a potential antiprion drug. But there were two catches.


Two big catches. First, it had to be administered directly into the brain. Second, and more importantly, the study provided no evidence for – indeed, some evidence against – the idea that PPS would work in already-symptomatic animals. As shown in Fig 2B above, Doh-Ura tested PPS at 7, 21, 35, and 42 dpi in mice that showned “definite symptoms” at 49 dpi (though Doh-Ura allowed for the possibility that more subtle earlier symptoms could have gone unnoticed) and died at 51 dpi. The effect of the drug was huge at 7 dpi, small by 35 dpi, and so tiny as to be statistically insignificant by 42 dpi. To help you see this, Doh-Ura has actually drawn line segments connecting through the means of the different groups:


The the lack of a ‘day 14′ experiment to evenly space the X axis makes the lines a bit misleading (the group means aren’t actually collinear as they appear in this figure), but the trend is pretty obvious. Based on this figure you can have a pretty good guess that mice not treated until they exhibited symptoms at day 49 or day 50 would not experience any increase in survival.


And Doh-Ura fully recognized this, noting that “our data do not guarantee similar effectiveness in human patients who already have signs and symptoms of the disease”. Acknowledging this, and acknowledging as well the personal and public health risks of installing intraventricular catheters in prion dsiease patients, Doh-Ura still chose to end the paper on an optimistic note. Though the United States was yet to start its own clinical trial of quinacrine, PRION-1, Doh-Ura had read the literature on quinacrine in mice and hamsters and had (correctly) concluded that quinacrine would not prove effective in humans. So he put forth PPS as the next candidate for clinical trials:


As an immediately applicable remedy, however, continuous intraventricular PPS administration with an infusion device may be a candidate for a clinical trial, with a view to preventing the disease in those people categorized as being at extremely high risk or to improving the prognosis of diseased people with TSEs.


PPS was already approved in the U.S. (and presumably in Japan too, though I can’t find any confirmation of that online) for interstitial cystitis, a.k.a. painful bladder syndrome, which is basically a diagnosis of exclusion meaning “we can’t identify any other problem to explain your symptoms, so we’ll call it this”. For a review of pentosan polysulfate in painful bladder syndrome, see Teichman 2002. The bladder connection seems at first interesting in light of the known connections between prion disease and bladder problems (see posts on dapsone and ibuprofen), though it’s almost surely a coincidence. In any event, here you have an already approved drug which might be effective against a sudden, deadly disease with no known treatment or cure. Almost immediately, neurologists started trying PPS in their prion disease patients.


Over the next five years, ambiguous reports of human results trickled in from several places. In the peer-reviewed journals, a handful of case reports arrived, some of which reported considerably extended survival [Todd 2005, Parry 2007, Rainov 2007] and some of which did not [Whittle 2006], though in no case was the patient’s condition seen to actually improve.


Other reports came from outside the traditional journal setting. A series of short articles in BMJ [Dyer 2003, Gould 2003, Mayor 2003] and a subsequent BBC report documented one family’s battle to get PPS (which is not an approved drug in Britain) approved for their son Jonathan Simms – they eventually prevailed and the young man, though still sick, remained alive with vCJD for 10 years (he passed away in 2011) while being treated with PPS – possibly the same patient from Todd 2005. BBC also reported that MRC had announced the drug “had appeared to help several people live longer than expected.” And in a powerpoint apparently presented at a meeting in Glasgow organized by CJD Alliance, Dr. Ian Bone reported on eight U.K. patients who had, again, lived slightly longer than expected, though with multiple complications related to the ventricular catheters and one possible adverse reaction to the drug itself [Bone 2006].


That powerpoint is actually a more accessible discussion of the issues involved in the study design than many of the published papers are. Bullets on slides 2 and 23 show a key part of Bone’s thought process: there are too few prion disease patients, and their diseases are too urgent, for there to ever be a large, statistically powered case/control study as is the standard in medicine. Instead, we are stuck with an observational study of a handful of patients – but if we can use a “surrogate marker” to assess disease progression, maybe we can tell if the drug is working in each individual. It is this same thought process that motivates our early biomarkers research goal at Prion Alliance.


Formal reports on PPS’s efficacy finally came out in 2008-9. Bone reported that the seven patients formally included in the observational study in the U.K. had indeed lived longer than the mean for their respective prion diseases, but clinical symptoms as well as MRI – his “surrogate marker” – both showed continued disease progression after drug treatment began [Bone 2008]. The slightly longer survival might be due to PPS but Bone felt he couldn’t rule out several other possible explanations:


chance alone and biases such as lead-time bias from attentive carers diagnosing onset early; selection bias from included patients having prolonged survival whilst awaiting PPS or bias from increased use of active interventions for complications in more actively managed PPS patients amongst others


The report doesn’t take a firm stance for or against continued use of PPS in humans, instead concluding that “More experimental work in animal models is clearly needed” and that “Until then, all patients with prion diseases considering PPS therapy should be informed of existing evidence and, if opting for treatment, managed and monitored in a standardized manner”.


The following year, Doh-Ura and his colleagues reported on their use of PPS in eleven patients in Japan [Tsuboi 2009] with almost identical results. Again, the patients survived longer than mean for their diseases, but not out of the plausible range, and showed “continued deterioration” after drug treatment commenced.


Both of these formal reports discuss the possibility that different doses might be more effective, and neither rules out the possibility of further use of PPS. But not much has been published on PPS since then: a Google scholar search for more recent papers on prion pentosan polysulfate since 2011 turned up only one more case report [Terada 2010] and a good review of all the human case reports and observational studies [Appleby 2011].


In reading all these reports, perhaps the most interesting thing I noticed was in Bone’s Table 1 introducing the seven patients from the U.K. observational study, including their dates of disease onset and treatment and their clinical state [Bone 2008]. The patients had started PPS treatment anywhere from 6 months to 2.5 years after disease onset. At the time that the official observational period commenced (which was for most patients 1-2 years after they had already begun receiving PPS), three were bed-bound and two were chair-bound.


We don’t know whether the patients were already bed-bound or chair-bound when they started PPS treatment, but given the length of time between disease onset and treatment, it does seem likely that they were very sick by the time they started receiving the drug.


In the mouse study that touched off all this interest in PPS, Doh-Ura stated that the first noted symptom in the mice was “ambiguous signs of reduced activity” two days prior to death, so on average 49 dpi, while his experiments showed no significant effect of PPS even when started at 42 dpi. Since investigators won’t notice subtle symptoms in a mouse, it is very hard to know what day post infection in a mouse corresponds to the moment, in a human patient, that a diagnosis would be made. But given the disease state of the patients and the length of time between disease onset and initiation of treatment, it seems they were much closer to the equivalent of 49 dpi than they were to 35 dpi (the latest treatment date for which Doh-Ura observed a significant effect), by the time they received treatment.


Some of the delay in starting treatment for these patients was surely due to the experimental nature of the PPS treatment. But given the swift and unexpected nature of prion diseases, it seems that even under the best of conditions, it is very likely that patients will decline severely before any treatment can be started. Patients will need to exhibit a significant decline before it even triggers a hospital visit, referrals to specialists at tertiary care facilities will have to be made, and diagnosis will not always be quick or easy and tests will not always give immediate confirmation. The only exception to this rule is the handful of genetic prion disease carriers who have chosen to be tested and know their status – but healthy asymptomatic individuals will never go in for intraventricular catheterization.


Hence the inherent contradiction in pentosan polysulfate: it’s only effective at times when the patient’s condition is not desperate enough to merit such drastic measures.


Possibly this all could have been recognized at the outset: Doh-Ura’s study was extremely thorough and extremely honest about the fact that PPS required intraventricular infusion and didn’t work late in the disease. But given the complete fatality of prion diseases and the utter lack of any treatments, desperation gave way, and the story of Jonathan Simms as documented by BBC and BMJ shows that even when medical authorities are duly skeptical of a potential treatment, families will actively campaign to be able to use it. After all, they’ve got nothing to lose.













Wednesday, March 28, 2012


VARIABLY PROTEASE-SENSITVE PRIONOPATHY IS TRANSMISSIBLE, price of prion poker goes up again $

http://prionopathy.blogspot.com/2012/03/variably-protease-sensitve-prionopathy.html


http://sporadicffi.blogspot.com/





Friday, November 23, 2012

sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease update As at 5th November 2012 UK, USA, AND CANADA
http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/2012/11/sporadic-creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.html





Saturday, December 15, 2012

Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: the effect of oral exposure dose on attack rate and incubation period in cattle -- an update 5 December 2012
http://bse-atypical.blogspot.com/2012/12/bovine-spongiform-encephalopathy-effect.html






http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/





Terry S. Singeltary Sr. P.O. Box 42 Bacliff, Texas USA 77518



MOM DOD 12/14/97 CONFIRMED hvCJD...

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Range of brain diseases Prion, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's could be treated by single drug



Range of brain diseases could be treated by single drug







Brain cells
Can brain cell death be prevented in a range of diseases?




The tantalising prospect of treating a range of brain diseases, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, all with the same drug, has been raised by UK researchers.



In a study, published in Nature, they prevented brain cells dying in mice with prion disease.



It is hoped the same method for preventing brain cell death could apply in other diseases.



The findings are at an early stage, but have been heralded as "fascinating".



Many neuro-degenerative diseases result in the build-up of proteins which are not put together correctly - known as misfolded proteins. This happens in Alzherimer's, Parkinson's and Huntington's as well as in prion diseases, such as the human form of mad cow disease.


Turn off


Researchers at the University of Leicester uncovered how the build-up of proteins in mice with prion disease resulted in brain cells dying.



They showed that as misfolded protein levels rise in the brain, cells respond by trying to shut down the production of all new proteins.



It is the same trick cells use when infected with a virus. Stopping production of proteins stops the virus spreading. However, shutting down the factory for a long period of time ends up killing the brain cells as they do not produce the proteins they actually need to function.


“Start Quote



There are good reasons for believing this response, identified with prion disease, applies also to Alzheimer's and other neuro-degenerative diseases”



End Quote Prof Roger Morris King's College London




The team at the Medical Research Council laboratory in Leicester then tried to manipulate the switch which turned the protein factory off. When they prevented cells from shutting down, they prevented the brain dying. The mice then lived significantly longer.



Each neuro-degenerative disease results in a unique set of misfolded proteins being produced, which are then thought to lead to brain cells dying.



Prof Giovanna Mallucci told the BBC: "The novelty here is we're just targeting the protein shut-down, we're ignoring the prion protein and that's what makes it potentially relevant across the board."



The idea, which has not yet been tested, is that if preventing the shut down protects the brain in prion disease - it might work in all diseases that have misfolded proteins.



Prof Mallucci added: "What it gives you is an appealing concept that one pathway and therefore one treatment could have benefits across a range of disorders.



"But the idea is in its early stages. We would really need to confirm this concept in other diseases."

'Fascinating'





Brains
Alzheimer's brain on the left showing shrinkage, with a healthy brain on the right








The study has been broadly welcomed by other scientists although many point out that the research is in its infancy.



Professor of Molecular Neurobiology at King's College London, Roger Morris, said it was a "breakthrough in understanding what kills neurons".



He added: "There are good reasons for believing this response, identified with prion disease, applies also to Alzheimer's and other neuro-degenerative diseases.



"And because it is such a general response, we already have some drugs that inhibit this response."



Prof Andy Randall, from the University of Bristol, said: "This is a fascinating piece of work.



"It will be interesting to see if similar processes occur in some of the common diseases with such deposits, for example Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.



"Furthermore, if this is the case, can modulating this same pathway be a route to new therapeutic approaches in these more prevalent conditions that afflict many millions of sufferers around the world? Ultimately only more research will tell us this."



Dr Eric Karran, the director of research at Alzheimer's Research UK, said: "The findings present the appealing concept that one treatment could have benefits for a range of different diseases; however the idea is in its early stages.



"The research focuses on the effects of the prion protein and we would need to see the same results confirmed in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's to really strengthen the evidence."








http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17952797





Sustained translational repression by eIF2α-P mediates prion neurodegeneration




Julie A. Moreno,1










Journal name:
Nature
Year published:
(2012)
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature11058



Received
Accepted
Published online





The mechanisms leading to neuronal death in neurodegenerative disease are poorly understood. Many of these disorders, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and prion diseases, are associated with the accumulation of misfolded disease-specific proteins. The unfolded protein response is a protective cellular mechanism triggered by rising levels of misfolded proteins. One arm of this pathway results in the transient shutdown of protein translation, through phosphorylation of the α-subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor, eIF2. Activation of the unfolded protein response and/or increased eIF2α-P levels are seen in patients with Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and prion diseases1, 2, 3, 4, but how this links to neurodegeneration is unknown. Here we show that accumulation of prion protein during prion replication causes persistent translational repression of global protein synthesis by eIF2α-P, associated with synaptic failure and neuronal loss in prion-diseased mice. Further, we show that promoting translational recovery in hippocampi of prion-infected mice is neuroprotective. Overexpression of GADD34, a specific eIF2α-P phosphatase, as well as reduction of levels of prion protein by lentivirally mediated RNA interference, reduced eIF2α-P levels. As a result, both approaches restored vital translation rates during prion disease, rescuing synaptic deficits and neuronal loss, thereby significantly increasing survival. In contrast, salubrinal, an inhibitor of eIF2α-P dephosphorylation5, increased eIF2α-P levels, exacerbating neurotoxicity and significantly reducing survival in prion-diseased mice. Given the prevalence of protein misfolding and activation of the unfolded protein response in several neurodegenerative diseases, our results suggest that manipulation of common pathways such as translational control, rather than disease-specific approaches, may lead to new therapies preventing synaptic failure and neuronal loss across the spectrum of these disorders.









TSS 

Monday, August 1, 2011

Protease-resistant PrP and PrP oligomers in the brain in human prion diseases after intraventricular pentosan polysulfate infusion

Protease-resistant PrP and PrP oligomers in the brain in human prion diseases after intraventricular pentosan polysulfate infusion


Hiroyuki Honda1,*, Kensuke Sasaki1, Haruhiko Minaki1, Kenta Masui1, Satoshi O. Suzuki1, Katsumi Doh-ura2, Toru Iwaki1Article first published online: 1 AUG 2011

DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2011.01245.x

© 2011 Japanese Society of Neuropathology

Keywords:Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease;oligomer;pentosan polysulfate;prion protein;size-exclusion gel chromatography


Intraventricular infusion of pentosan polysulfate (PPS) as a treatment for various human prion diseases has been applied in Japan. To evaluate the influence of PPS treatment we performed pathological examination and biochemical analyses of PrP molecules in autopsied brains treated with PPS (one case of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD, case 1), two cases of dura mater graft-associated CJD (dCJD, cases 2 and 4), and one case of Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease (GSS, case 3). Six cases of sCJD without PPS treatment were examined for comparison. Protease-resistant PrP (PrPres) in the frontal lobe was evaluated by Western blotting after proteinase K digestion. Further, the degree of polymerization of PrP molecules was examined by the size-exclusion gel chromatography assay. PPS infusions were started 3–10 months after disease onset, but the treatment did not achieve any clinical improvements. Postmortem examinations of the treated cases revealed symmetrical brain lesions, including neuronal loss, spongiform change and gliosis. Noteworthy was GFAP in the cortical astrocytes reduced in all treated cases despite astrogliosis. Immunohistochemistry for PrP revealed abnormal synaptic deposits in all treated cases and further plaque-type PrP deposition in case 3 of GSS and case 4 of dCJD. Western blotting showed relatively low ratios of PrPres in case 2 of dCJD and case 3 of GSS, while in the treated sCJD (case 1), the ratio of PrPres was comparable with untreated cases. The indices of oligomeric PrP were reduced in one sCJD (case 1) and one dCJD (case 2). Although intraventricular PPS infusion might modify the accumulation of PrP oligomers in the brains of patients with prion diseases, the therapeutic effects are still uncertain.



http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1440-1789.2011.01245.x/abstract


Tuesday, June 14, 2011

sporadic CJD, Quinacrine Study, MRI misdiagnosis USA

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2011/06/clinical-research-in-cjd-at-us-clinical.html


http://prionpps.blogspot.com/2011/06/sporadic-cjd-quinacrine-study-mri.html


Thursday, October 15, 2009

ANA: No Benefit for Quinacrine in CJD

http://prionpps.blogspot.com/2009/10/ana-no-benefit-for-quinacrine-in-cjd.html


Wednesday, March 11, 2009

PRION1 trial reports quinacrine does not increase survival in patients with prion disease

http://prionpps.blogspot.com/2009/03/prion1-trial-reports-quinacrine-does.html


Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Intraventricular pentosan polysulphate in human prion diseases: an observational study in the UK

http://prionpps.blogspot.com/2008/03/intraventricular-pentosan-polysulphate.html


UPDATE JULY 2011 MORE OF THE "PENDING CLASSIFICATION CREUTZFELDT JAKOB DISEASE'' STEADY INCREASING...TSS

case; 5 Includes 13 cases in which the diagnosis is pending, and 18 inconclusive cases; 6 Includes 18 (15 from 2011) cases with type determination pending in which the diagnosis of vCJD has been excluded.

http://www.cjdsurveillance.com/pdf/case-table.pdf


Monday, August 9, 2010

National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center Cases Examined (July 31, 2010)

(please watch and listen to the video and the scientist speaking about atypical BSE and sporadic CJD and listen to Professor Aguzzi)

http://prionunitusaupdate2008.blogspot.com/2010/08/national-prion-disease-pathology.html


Saturday, March 5, 2011

MAD COW ATYPICAL CJD PRION TSE CASES WITH CLASSIFICATIONS PENDING ON THE RISE IN NORTH AMERICA

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2011/03/mad-cow-atypical-cjd-prion-tse-cases.html


Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Atypical BSE in Cattle

To date the OIE/WAHO assumes that the human and animal health standards set out in the BSE chapter for classical BSE (C-Type) applies to all forms of BSE which include the H-type and L-type atypical forms. This assumption is scientifically not completely justified and accumulating evidence suggests that this may in fact not be the case. Molecular characterization and the spatial distribution pattern of histopathologic lesions and immunohistochemistry (IHC) signals are used to identify and characterize atypical BSE. Both the L-type and H-type atypical cases display significant differences in the conformation and spatial accumulation of the disease associated prion protein (PrPSc) in brains of afflicted cattle. Transmission studies in bovine transgenic and wild type mouse models support that the atypical BSE types might be unique strains because they have different incubation times and lesion profiles when compared to C-type BSE.

When L-type BSE was inoculated into ovine transgenic mice and Syrian hamster the resulting molecular fingerprint had changed, either in the first or a subsequent passage, from L-type into C-type BSE. In addition, non-human primates are specifically susceptible for atypical BSE as demonstrated by an approximately 50% shortened incubation time for L-type BSE as compared to C-type. Considering the current scientific information available, it cannot be assumed that these different BSE types pose the same human health risks as C-type BSE or that these risks are mitigated by the same protective measures.

This study will contribute to a correct definition of specified risk material (SRM) in atypical BSE. The incumbent of this position will develop new and transfer existing, ultra-sensitive methods for the detection of atypical BSE in tissue of experimentally infected cattle.

http://www.prionetcanada.ca/detail.aspx?menu=5&dt=293380&app=93&cat1=387&tp=20&lk=no&cat2


Thursday, August 12, 2010

Seven main threats for the future linked to prions

First threat

The TSE road map defining the evolution of European policy for protection against prion diseases is based on a certain numbers of hypotheses some of which may turn out to be erroneous. In particular, a form of BSE (called atypical Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy), recently identified by systematic testing in aged cattle without clinical signs, may be the origin of classical BSE and thus potentially constitute a reservoir, which may be impossible to eradicate if a sporadic origin is confirmed.

***Also, a link is suspected between atypical BSE and some apparently sporadic cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. These atypical BSE cases constitute an unforeseen first threat that could sharply modify the European approach to prion diseases.

Second threat

snip...

http://www.neuroprion.org/en/np-neuroprion.html


http://prionpathy.blogspot.com/2010/08/seven-main-threats-for-future-linked-to.html


http://prionpathy.blogspot.com/



Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee

The possible impacts and consequences for public health, trade and agriculture of the Government's decision to relax import restrictions on beef Final report June 2010

2.65 At its hearing on 14 May 2010, the committee heard evidence from Dr Alan Fahey who has recently submitted a thesis on the clinical neuropsychiatric, epidemiological and diagnostic features of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.48 Dr Fahey told the committee of his concerns regarding the lengthy incubation period for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, the inadequacy of current tests and the limited nature of our current understanding of this group of diseases.49

2.66 Dr Fahey also told the committee that in the last two years a link has been established between forms of atypical CJD and atypical BSE. Dr Fahey said that: They now believe that those atypical BSEs overseas are in fact causing sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. They were not sure if it was due to mad sheep disease or a different form. If you look in the textbooks it looks like this is just arising by itself. But in my research I have a summary of a document which states that there has never been any proof that sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease has arisen de novo-has arisen of itself. There is no proof of that. The recent research is that in fact it is due to atypical forms of mad cow disease which have been found across Europe, have been found in America and have been found in Asia. These atypical forms of mad cow disease typically have even longer incubation periods than the classical mad cow disease.50

http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/rrat_ctte/mad_cows/report/report.pdf



14th ICID International Scientific Exchange Brochure -

Final Abstract Number: ISE.114

Session: International Scientific Exchange

Transmissible Spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) animal and human TSE in North America update October 2009

T. Singeltary

Bacliff, TX, USA

Background:

An update on atypical BSE and other TSE in North America. Please remember, the typical U.K. c-BSE, the atypical l-BSE (BASE), and h-BSE have all been documented in North America, along with the typical scrapie's, and atypical Nor-98 Scrapie, and to date, 2 different strains of CWD, and also TME. All these TSE in different species have been rendered and fed to food producing animals for humans and animals in North America (TSE in cats and dogs ?), and that the trading of these TSEs via animals and products via the USA and Canada has been immense over the years, decades.

Methods:

12 years independent research of available data

Results:

I propose that the current diagnostic criteria for human TSEs only enhances and helps the spreading of human TSE from the continued belief of the UKBSEnvCJD only theory in 2009. With all the science to date refuting it, to continue to validate this old myth, will only spread this TSE agent through a multitude of potential routes and sources i.e. consumption, medical i.e., surgical, blood, dental, endoscopy, optical, nutritional supplements, cosmetics etc.

Conclusion:

I would like to submit a review of past CJD surveillance in the USA, and the urgent need to make all human TSE in the USA a reportable disease, in every state, of every age group, and to make this mandatory immediately without further delay. The ramifications of not doing so will only allow this agent to spread further in the medical, dental, surgical arena's. Restricting the reporting of CJD and or any human TSE is NOT scientific. Iatrogenic CJD knows NO age group, TSE knows no boundaries. I propose as with Aguzzi, Asante, Collinge, Caughey, Deslys, Dormont, Gibbs, Gajdusek, Ironside, Manuelidis, Marsh, et al and many more, that the world of TSE Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy is far from an exact science, but there is enough proven science to date that this myth should be put to rest once and for all, and that we move forward with a new classification for human and animal TSE that would properly identify the infected species, the source species, and then the route.

http://ww2.isid.org/Downloads/14th_ICID_ISE_Abstracts.pdf



Monday, May 23, 2011

Atypical Prion Diseases in Humans and Animals 2011

Top Curr Chem (2011)

DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_161

# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Michael A. Tranulis, Sylvie L. Benestad, Thierry Baron, and Hans Kretzschmar

Abstract

Although prion diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in humans and scrapie in sheep, have long been recognized, our understanding of their epidemiology and pathogenesis is still in its early stages. Progress is hampered by the lengthy incubation periods and the lack of effective ways of monitoring and characterizing these agents. Protease-resistant conformers of the prion protein (PrP), known as the "scrapie form" (PrPSc), are used as disease markers, and for taxonomic purposes, in correlation with clinical, pathological, and genetic data. In humans, prion diseases can arise sporadically (sCJD) or genetically (gCJD and others), caused by mutations in the PrP-gene (PRNP), or as a foodborne infection, with the agent of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) causing variant CJD (vCJD). Person-to-person spread of human prion disease has only been known to occur following cannibalism (kuru disease in Papua New Guinea) or through medical or surgical treatment (iatrogenic CJD, iCJD). In contrast, scrapie in small ruminants and chronic wasting disease (CWD) in cervids behave as infectious diseases within these species. Recently, however, so-called atypical forms of prion diseases have been discovered in sheep (atypical/Nor98 scrapie) and in cattle, BSE-H and BSE-L. These maladies resemble sporadic or genetic human prion diseases and might be their animal equivalents. This hypothesis also raises the significant public health question of possible epidemiological links between these diseases and their counterparts in humans.

M.A. Tranulis (*)

Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway

e-mail: Michael.Tranulis@nvh.no

S.L. Benestad

Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway

T. Baron

Agence Nationale de Se´curite´ Sanitaire, ANSES, Lyon, France

H. Kretzschmar

Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Keywords Animal Atypical Atypical/Nor98 scrapie BSE-H BSE-L Human Prion disease Prion strain Prion type

http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=f433r34h34ugg617&size=largest


snip...SEE MORE HERE ;

http://bse-atypical.blogspot.com/2011/05/atypical-prion-diseases-in-humans-and.html


Tuesday, April 26, 2011

sporadic CJD RISING Text and figures of the latest annual report of the NCJDRSU covering the period 1990-2009 (published 11th March 2011)

http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/2011/04/sporadic-cjd-rising-text-and-figures-of.html


Wednesday, June 29, 2011

TSEAC Meeting August 1, 2011 donor deferral Saudi Arabia vCJD risk blood and blood products

http://tseac.blogspot.com/2011/06/tseac-meeting-august-1-2011-donor.html


Friday, June 17, 2011

Treatable neurological disorders misdiagnosed as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/2011/06/treatable-neurological-disorders.html


Saturday, January 22, 2011

Alzheimer's, Prion, and Neurological disease, and the misdiagnosis there of, a review 2011

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2011/01/alzheimers-prion-and-neurological.html



Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Canadian Researchers Receive $2.9 Million to Protect Against Prion Disease Outbreaks, Develop Novel Therapies to Treat Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and ALS

http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2011/07/canadian-researchers-receive-29-million.html


http://bse-atypical.blogspot.com/


http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/


http://nor-98.blogspot.com/


http://scrapie-usa.blogspot.com/


http://transmissible-mink-encephalopathy.blogspot.com/


http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/


http://sporadicffi.blogspot.com/


http://kuru-tse.blogspot.com/


http://prionopathy.blogspot.com/


http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/


TSS

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

sporadic CJD, Quinacrine Study, MRI misdiagnosis USA

Tuesday, June 14, 2011




Clinical research in CJD at a U.S. clinical prion research center: CJD Quinacrine Study results and improved diagnosis of prion disease



http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2011/06/clinical-research-in-cjd-at-us-clinical.html